Rapid wound debridement

HydroClean® mini

Part of the HydroClean Family

HydroClean® mini

Rapid wound Debridement Fast. Simple. Effective

HydroClean® mini, the new addition to the HydroClean® Family.

HydroClean® mini is especially designed for small, cavity or superficial.

The benefit of autolytic and mechanical debridement in one dressing therapy.

*within 14 days compared to baseline

Facilitates autolytic debridement | Up to 69% removal of necrosis and devitalised tissue*[1]

Infection management | Significantly reduces bacterial load[2,3,6] and disrupts biofilm[8]

Pain relief | More than 3 in 4 patients experienced no pain during wear time[1] Nearly 50% of patients who did experience pain, reported a significant improvement[1]

Facilitates autolytic debridement | Up to 69% removal of necrosis and devitalised tissue*[1]

Exudate control| 92% of clinicians rated it good or excellent at exudate management control[1]

Cost effective | Approximately

21% vs. honey,

98% vs. larval

30% savings vs mechanical debridement[1]
Cost savings instead of standard treatment, including amputation is about 93,5%[7]

Providing rapid wound debridement

Properties:

Unique debriding mode of action: HydroClean® miniirrigates the wound while absorbing dead tissue, necrosis, bacteria and exudate.

The superabsorbent polymers ensure an optimal absorption of exudate while the Ringer‘s solution continuously cleanses and moisturises the wound bed.

HydroClean® Available Sizing

HydroClean® mini
Dressing SizeDressings Per PackHARTMANN Code
3 cm round10609 001
HydroClean®
Dressing SizeDressings Per PackHARTMANN Code
4 cm round10609 220
4 x 8 cm oval10609 222
5.5 cm round10609 224
7.5 x 7.5 cm10609 226
10 x 10cm10609 228
HydroClean® Cavity
Dressing SizeDressings Per PackHARTMANN Code

4 cm round

10609 002
4 x 8 cm oval10609 004
5.5 cm round10609 006
7.5 x 7.5 cm10609 008
10 x 10 cm10609 012

[1] Hodgson, H. et al. (2017). A multicentre, clinical evaluation of a hydro-responsive wound dressing: the Glasgow experience. Journal of Wound Care 26(11), pp. 643-650. [2] Atkin, L. and Ousey, K. (2016). Wound bed preparation: A novel approach using HydroTherapy. British Journal of Community Nursing 21 (Supplt. 12), pp. S23-S28. [3] Ousey, K. et al.(2016). HydroTherapy Made Easy. Wounds UK 12(4). [4] Colegrave, M. et al. (2016). The effect of Ringer’s solution within a dressing to elicit pain relief. Journal of Wound Care 25(4), pp. 184-190. [5] Humbert, P. et al. (2014). Protease-modulating polyacrylate based hydrogel stimulates wound bed preparation in venous leg ulcers – a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 28(12),pp. 1742-1750. [6] Kaspar, D. et al. (2008). Effi cacité clinique du pansement irrigo-absorbant HydroClean® active contenant du polyacrylate superabsorbant dans le traitement des plaies chroniques – étude observationnelle conduite sur 221 patients. Journal des Plaies et Cicatrisations 13(63), pp. 21-24. [7] Cooke, M. et al. (2017). Enabling wound healing and preventing limb amputation: a cost–benefi t case study of Hydro-Responsive Wound Dressings. Journal of Wound Care 13(4), pp. 80-91. [8] Davies L. et al. (2017). An Assessment of Biofi lm Disruption and Bacteriostatic Capabilities of an Autolytic Debridement Dressing. Wounds UK Annual Conference. Harrogate, 13-15 November, 2017 [9] Smola, H. (2016). Simplifi ed treatment options require high-performance dressings – from molecular mechanisms to intelligent dressing choices. EWMA 2016. Bremen, 11-13 May, 2016. [10] Ousey, K. et al. (2016). Hydro-Responsive Wound Dressings simplify T.I.M.E. wound management framework. British Journal of Community Nursing 21 (Supplt. 12), pp. S39-S49. [11] Spruce,P. et al. (2016). Introducing HydroClean® plus for wound-bed preparation: a case series. Wounds International 7(1), pp. 26-32. [12] Ousey, K. et al. (2016). HydroClean® plus: a new perspective to wound cleansing and debridement. Wounds UK 12(1), pp. 94-104. [13] Atkin, L. and Rippon, M. (2016). Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue. British Journal of Nursing 25(20), pp. S40-S47. [14] Kaspar, D. et al. (2015). Economic benefi t of a polyacrylate-based hydrogel compared to an amorphous hydrogel in wound bed preparation of venous leg ulcers. Chronic Wound Care Management and Research 2, pp. 63-70. [15] Knestele, M (2004). The treatment of problematic wounds with HydroClean plus – tried and tested over many years in clinical practice. HARTMANN Data on fi le [16] Kaspar, D. (2011). Therapeutic effectiveness, compatibility and handling in the daily routine of hospitals or physicians’s practices. HARTMANN Data on fi le: Hydro-responsive Wound Dressing (HRWD) and AquaClear Technology are trademarks of HARTMANN.