Hydro-Responsive Wound Dressing (HRWD™) offering rapid wound debridement
HydroClean® provides physical autolytic debridement: with the attributes of autolytic debridement and the benefits of mechanical debridement.
Reduced patient pain
Clinical evaluation shows HydroClean®provides rapid debridement with a reduction in patient pain during wear time. [2,4]
Suitable wound types
HydroClean can be used on most acute and chronic wounds, including the following but not limited to; pressure ulcers, venous (VLUs) and arterial leg ulcers (ALUs), diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), acute wounds, surgical wounds, burns, donor sites, malignant wounds, traumatic wounds, abrasions, or fungating wounds.
Our HydroClean®mini, 3cm round dressing, is perfect for small and cavity wounds such as venous leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) on toes, at the metatarsal and ankle, other small or cavity wounds where clinically appropriate.
Patient case study
Watch the videos below to discover the successes healthcare professionals have experienced using HydroClean®
Watch the video below to discover the success Vascular Nurse Consultant, Leanne Atkin, experienced with HydroClean®
Watch the video below to discover the success Consultant Nurse - Burns, Jacky Edwards, experienced with HydroClean®
Benefits of HydroClean®
Wound cleansing and wound bed preparation management
HydroClean®significantly reduces bacterial load [2,3,5] and disrupts biofilm .
Facilitates autolytic debridement
Up to 69% of necrosis and devitalised tissue removed within 14 days compared to baseline .
Pain relief for your patients
More than 3 in 4 patients experienced no pain during wear time . Additionally, out of the remaining patients who did experience pain, nearly 50% of those patients reported a significant improvement and pain reduction  throughout treatment with HydroClean®.
92% of clinicians rated HydroClean®as good or excellent at managing exudate .
Approximate cost savings against other debridement wound dressings:
21% potential saving verses honey 
98% potential saving verses larval 
30% potential saving verses mechanical debridement 
93,5% potential saving verses standard treatment including amputation 
Watch the video below to learn how HydroClean® works
Request a sample or talk to our team about HydroClean®
 Hodgson, H. et al. (2017). A multicentre, clinical evaluation of a hydro-responsive wound dressing: the Glasgow experience. Journal of Wound Care 26(11), pp. 643-650.  Atkin, L. and Ousey, K. (2016). Wound bed preparation: A novel approach using HydroTherapy. British Journal of Community Nursing 21 (Supplt. 12), pp. S23-S28.  Ousey, K. et al.(2016). HydroTherapy Made Easy. Wounds UK 12(4).  Colegrave, M. et al. (2016). The effect of Ringer’s solution within a dressing to elicit pain relief. Journal of Wound Care 25(4), pp. 184-190.  Humbert, P. et al. (2014). Protease-modulating polyacrylate based hydrogel stimulates wound bed preparation in venous leg ulcers – a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 28(12),pp. 1742-1750.  Kaspar, D. et al. (2008). Effi cacité clinique du pansement irrigo-absorbant HydroClean® active contenant du polyacrylate superabsorbant dans le traitement des plaies chroniques – étude observationnelle conduite sur 221 patients. Journal des Plaies et Cicatrisations 13(63), pp. 21-24.  Cooke, M. et al. (2017). Enabling wound healing and preventing limb amputation: a cost–benefit case study of Hydro-Responsive Wound Dressings. Journal of Wound Care 13(4), pp. 80-91.  Davies L. et al. (2017). An Assessment of Biofilm Disruption and Bacteriostatic Capabilities of an Autolytic Debridement Dressing. Wounds UK Annual Conference. Harrogate, 13-15 November, 2017